Internet filtering software comparison how to#
Internet filtering software comparison software#

In early 2006 the Federal Labor Party (ALP) announced that they would implement mandatory ISP-filtering if elected. In 1999 it was politicians within the Federal Coalition Government, in early 2003 it was The Australia Institute, in late 2004 it was the Family First Party, in late 2005 it was people associated with the 'Sexual Integrity Forum' organised by the Fatherhood Foundation including Senator Guy Barnett (Lib. In recent years in Australia, various groups and individuals have campaigned for government mandated ISP-based filtering and blocking of Web pages unsuitable for children.

Information and Advice for Parents about Internet Child Safety.

Content Rating and Labelling Systems - see separate page.

Internet filtering software comparison software#

Filter Software Companies' connections with religious groups and/or governments.Reports on tests focussed on under- and over- blocking issues.

PC-based Filter Products with Server-Based Filtering.

Content Filtering and Blocking Software.

Australian Law related to use of Filtering Software.

Parry Aftab, Executive, Submission to NTIA 15 July 2002 Internet safety education is key to this, and should be mandated, not filtering.

Internet filtering software comparison how to#

This leads to sites being blocked or filtered that do not fall under the criteria set by CIPA.We owe it to our children to improve the filter between their ears that will help them know whom to trust, how to click the 'back button' to avoid inappropriate content and how to enjoy the wonders of the Internet, safely and privately. Instead it should be the CIPA to decide what content is appropriate for students and what is not. So it is the private companies who decide what content is to be blocked and what should be allowed. This strict over-blocking limit Internet access for students and teachers as well.Д«iased blockingAll of these internet filters are created by private companies and not CIPA. The same study found that many websites related to state curriculum were also blocked by these internet filters. The schools who fail to do so, will not receive and e-Rate assistance.ДЄccessing Other Websites is Affected As WellIn a study it was found that Internet filtering software implement in schools also blocked many other websites which did not contain any harmful or inappropriate content. All CIPA regulated schools must adopt Internet filter policies to monitor minors internet activities. the schools qualify as e-rated schools get discounted communication technologies from federal authorities. Internet Filters Help Schools Get E-Rated FundingThe schools that have implemented internet filters, i.e.

Blocking such content give teachers the confidence that their students can use internet without encountering any harmful content. When the school authorities implement a strict internet policy, it prevent students from accessing content which is inappropriate for that age group. Safe And Secure SurfingInternet filters in a school assure a safe and secure web surfing. Following are some of the main Pros and Cons of implementing internet filters in a school. On one hand they provide secure surfing and on the other hand they, at times, block other website which do not fall in that category. Like every coin has two sides of it, Internet filters too come with advantages & disadvantages. The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) passed in 1999, requires schools qualifying for federal E-rate funding to use filtering technology to block access to materials that are 'obscene, child pornography, or harmful to minors'. Pros & Cons of Internet Filtering in Schools